![]() Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below. To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice): The content of this article is intended to provide a general TrainingĪnd updates for staff involved in responding, as well asĪdministrative staff in general, is also key. Would prevent them from completing the records request. More easily determine whether there is a relevant statute that When they receive a public records request, they can They regularly encounter, may be subject to, and may provide aīasis for limiting their response and protecting confidential Themselves with the topics of the various statutes and regulations Request should first ensure the subject matter requested is notĪlready addressed in another statutory scheme that would supersede Maricopa County, a public body responding to a public records § 44-1376.01 addresses utility customerīased on the Court's opinion in Audit-USA v. § 12-2292 addresses the disclosure of medical § 44-1373 addresses disclosure of personal § 39-123.01 addresses the personal identifying Personal identifying information, medical information, or utility Many Arizona laws prohibit disclosure of information, such as ![]() Information would act in the same way and similarly take precedence To reason that other laws prohibiting the disclosure of certain Statute takes precedence over the public records process. Public records request is otherwise addressed by statute, such Unlimited, and stands for the proposition that if the topic of a Precedent that states Arizona's public records laws are not This is consistent with Arizona public records The Court stated that it did not need to address theĪpplicability of public records laws because the issue ofĭisclosure of ballots was definitively resolved by statutory Records, the Court's opinion contains a second significant Besides clarifying the statutory scheme governing election Not include general disclosures under a public-records Images of cast ballots is authorized by court order, but those do "here may be circumstances in which disclosing digital § 16-625 to categorically prohibitĭisclosure of digital images and ballots, observing that Images of ballots to be protected from both "physical andĮlectronic access," with security measures equal to or greater ![]() § 16-625 requires electronic data and digital "unopened and unaltered" at a "secure facility"įor 24 months following the close of an election. § 16-624 requires paper ballots to remain Pertaining to the protection of ballots prevented the requested Question of whether public records law applies because the statutes The Court of Appeals found that it did not need to reach the ![]() Ultimately, the trial court granted the dismissal, and the Courtġ. § 16-625 expressly prohibits theĬirculation of digital images of ballots. Maricopa County subsequently filed a motion to dismiss on Requested data, but withheld the digital images of the castīallots. Maricopa County provided Audit-USA with a copy of some of the Public body denies access to public records. § 39-121.02, which governs recourse when a Maricopa County did not respond to the request, so Audit-USA filed To the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors for digital images andĪssociated data of ballots cast in the November 2020 election. In February 2021, Audit-USA made a public records request 2023), addressing the fundamentals ofĪrizona's public records laws. In February 2023, the Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |